Employees should have autonomy or be micro-managed?- Article 5 (MBA-Course Module: MN7234ES- People and Organizations: Principles and Practices in Global Contexts
Employees should have autonomy or be micro-managed?
Source: (Ross, No Year)
Before we delve into the subject, let us first understand
the two terms:
Autonomy is when the
employees have the freedom to work on their own without any or very little
interference from management. Employees decide how and when their work should
be done (Wooll, 2021). Organizations that practice autonomy will have benefits
that I will be discussing in the following paragraphs.
Micro-Management- This is
really quite the opposite of autonomy. The micro-management is when the boss
supervises the entire tasks within the team. They do not give any
decision-making power to their employees and obsessed with information
gathering (Petrova, 2023).
Now let me say which approach is
ideal. Whether it is autonomy or micro-managing?
From the definitions told above,
it is quite obvious that micro-management will have a negative connotation.
However, it has its own purpose. We should never jump to quick conclusions. As
humans we have the power of reasoning. We should rationally think and reason
out. Otherwise, as individuals we are either bias or thinking very narrowly
without a rational and reasoning approach.
That being said, we should
understand that micro-managers are generally appropriate in some situations. So
let me elaborate it below.
·
Suppose the team is struggling to perform their
task and does not meet the required standards. Then it may be useful to closely
monitor for short durations. In such an instance, it will help the team to
focus and get back on track. However, the manager should discontinue once the
team has regained their focus and required standard of performance (Sharma,
2022).
·
Secondly, in crisis situations. The
circumstances are uncertain and dynamic. Therefore, the micromanager needs
precise communication and instructions on what the team needs to do. This is
exactly a situation when people need to use micromanagement in the workplace.
Again when the crisis situation is over or averted, the micromanagement needs
to be stopped (Sharma, 2022).
·
Next, when there is an immediate request from
any stakeholder that needs to be delivered urgently. It can be a major
customer, supplier or even any government authority. The micromanager will keep
tracking the progress with the team by closely monitoring and completing
because it is required urgently. By this the micromanager can keep the
stakeholder happy. Once completed or if is not urgent, then the micromanager
should not even interfere (Sharma, 2022).
·
Another very important situation is when working
with an inexperienced and young workforce because it is essential to provide
regular feedback to develop their skills appropriately. Micromanagers need to
provide the adequate training and experience to bring forth confidence and
settle them as a team. Finally, the micromanager has to slowly delegate and
build autonomy and take away the micromanagement (Sharma, 2022).
·
Lastly, to bring a delayed project on track.
When a project is delayed, it may be due to insufficient resources,
interpersonal conflicts, missed deadlines or incorrect assumptions. Therefore, with
careful planning, execution and close monitoring will help the team back on
track. Even to avoid further delays. Nevertheless, if there is no delay or
shortfall in projects, then the manager does not need to interfere (Sharma,
2022).
Now that I have justified the
purpose of why micro-management is done. We can see clearly that micromanagement
is entirely not bad. It is that we have to study the situation holistically and
apply the relevant technique.
However, the same negative
association is not for autonomy. Because employees have the freedom to work
at their own pace and they can decide how to perform the required tasks. That
being said, the employees should ensure that they take responsibility and
accountability for their work when their organizations and leaders have trusted
and provided them with the tasks and goals to be achieved at their discretion
by way of delegation. It is important employees do not take advantage when
management trusts and delegates their work. They should take ownership for it
and work in the best interests of the company. Consequently, there will be
benefits such as increased job satisfaction, there is high employment
engagement and motivation, improved employee retention, increased creativity
and innovation, a culture of trust is formed, increased productivity, employees
will feel valued and this will drive them to self-master skills development and
leadership qualities (Wooll, 2021).
So what did I learn?
Quite interestingly, had read a
lot to be able to justify my topic. Because it is usually easy to support an
argument when it has a positive attribution. Here it is autonomy. Everyone like
to have autonomy and work freely. We all tend to directly or indirectly vouch
for it. However, what we all fail to understand is that everything has its
purpose. There are situations where you cannot apply autonomy. We need to apply
the technique of micromanagement. Employees should be able to comprehend this.
Well, a very thoughtful and rational individual working in an organization will
be able to understand. This is a very important lesson and keynote I have taken
by reading and writing this blog.
In winding up, I defined
both terms namely, autonomy and micromanagement. Subsequently, elaborated my
position that we need to understand things in a rational approach. So, I
explained there could be situations where autonomy would not work and
management and leaders have to micromanage. So I explained that. In my final
two notes, I explained a little useful purpose of autonomy and my few learning
takeaways.
References:
Ross, S. (No Year) ‘Delegation vs Micromanagement: Finding
the Right Balance’, Sana Ross, No Date. Available at: https://www.sanaross.com/blog/delegation-vs-micromanagement-finding-the-right-balance
(Accessed: 26 November 2023).
Wooll, M. (2021) ‘Autonomy at work is important: Here are 9
ways to encourage it’, Betterup, 3 December. Available at: https://www.betterup.com/blog/autonomy-in-the-workplace#:~:text=Autonomy%20in%20the%20workplace%20means,their%20work%20should%20be%20done.
(Accessed: 26 November 2023).
Petrova, B. (2023) ‘What is Micromanagement and How to Deal
with it?’, Slingshot, 24 October. Available at: https://www.slingshotapp.io/blog/what-is-micromanagement
(Accessed: 26 November 2023).
Sharma, D. (2022) ‘Is Micromanagement at Work Good? 5
Scenarios Where it Works’, Risely, 6 June. Available at: https://www.risely.me/when-can-micromanagement-be-a-good-option-for-managers/#:~:text=If%20a%20team%20member%20struggles,and%20get%20back%20on%20track.
(Accessed: 26 November 2023).

Nobody wants to be in a workplace where their opinions will be rejected or they will be prevented from making work-related decisions on their own. according to my view, Autonomy at work is very important because it helps to improve employee engagement and productivity. Workers who know that their input is valued in the workplace are a lot more likely to be more involved in their tasks. They have a stronger connection to their jobs than workers who are not trusted to do anything on their own.
ReplyDeleteDear Respected Sir,
DeleteYes we love autonomy but there can be situations we may need to be micromanaged. That is the rational of my blog. My Blog focuses on what is the right balance between autonomy and micromanagement.
Hi Jasothan! Your argument focuses on the downsides of micromanagement, can you acknowledge any potential benefits or situations where it might be the lesser evil compared to other management styles? in consideration of Sri Lankan context?
ReplyDeleteI have not addressed the downsides of micromanagement. I have focused on neutral position on both micromanagement and autonomy. Just reiterating my position, whether Sri Lanka or globally, we as humans love autonomy. But, at times there are situations we may need to micromanaged. That is addressed in my blog!!!!
DeleteVery insightful article. I feel autonomy in SL will take a longer time to catch on as people here tend to misuse such privilege's when given to them. While some employees do not work unless they are being micromanaged.
ReplyDeleteI think context matters a lot as my article discussed. Suppose, if it is a new employee, say an intern, it is quite obvious he/she needs to micro-managed. However, if it is an experienced, I think it is otherwise. In that case, I dont even think that time is relevant here. Only the context.
DeleteOf course. Balancing autonomy and avoiding micro-management is crucial. Autonomy fosters initiative and innovation, while excessive control can lead to disengagement. A healthy mix allows for individual growth within a supportive framework.
ReplyDeleteYou have effectively navigates the complexities of autonomy and micromanagement, delivering useful insights for both individuals and leaders. Great addition to learning.
ReplyDeleteAutonomy is key and micromanagement is not feasible in the long terms. Yet eventhough we know this there's so many companies in Sri Lanka who have leaders that practice micromanagement. But I feel this is also because the right kind of direction and training has not been given to employees to create an autonomous working environment. Therefore I like the thoughts you have shared on autonomy and feel strongly that if there's to be progression, autonomy must exist.
ReplyDelete